Re: [PATCH]use kzalloc in vfs where appropriate

[Pekka Enberg]

Hi Oliver,

On 3/19/06, Oliver Neukum <oliver@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yes it is. The generated code is identical. But on second thought this is still
> not optimal. A full division is generated:
>
>         xorl    %edx, %edx
>         movl    $2147483647, %eax
>         movq    $0, 40(%rsp)
>         divq    %rcx
>         movl    $8, %edx
>         cmpq    %rax, %rdx
>         ja      .L313
>
> Rewriting the test as:
> n!=0 && n > INT_MAX / size
> saves the division because size is much likelier to be a constant, and indeed
> the code is better:
>
>         cmpq    $268435455, %rax
>         movq    $0, 40(%rsp)
>         ja      .L313
>
> Is there anything I am missing?

Did you check allyesconfig vmlinux size before and after? If it helps,
like it probably does, post a patch!

                                   Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/