Re: interactive task starvation

[Con Kolivas]

On Tuesday 21 March 2006 22:18, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> great work by Mike! One detail: i'd like there to be just one default
> throttling value, i.e. no grace_g tunables [so that we have just one
> default scheduler behavior]. Is the default grace_g[12] setting good
> enough for your workload?

I agree. If anything is required, a simple on/off tunable makes much more 
sense. Much like I suggested ages ago with an "interactive" switch which was 
rather unpopular when I first suggested it. Perhaps my marketing was wrong. 
Oh well.

Cheers,
Con
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/