Re: [RFC, PATCH 1/24] i386 Vmi documentation II

[Andi Kleen]

On Wednesday 22 March 2006 23:45, Zachary Amsden wrote:

> I propose an entirely different approach - use segmentation. 

That would require a lot of changes to save/restore the segmentation
register at kernel entry/exit since there is no swapgs on i386. 
And will be likely slower there too and also even slow down the 
VMI-kernel-no-hypervisor.

Still might be the best option.

How did that rumoured Xenolinux-over-VMI implementation solve that problem?

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/