SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED

[Luca Falavigna]

Hi,
I noticed you recently changed the way you handle SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED macro.
Former version was something like that:

#define SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(lockname) \
	(spinlock_t) { { __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(lockname) } }

while current version is:

# define SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED \
	(spinlock_t) { { __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED } }

I noticed your 2.6.16-rt6 patch includes two calls to
SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(lockname) macro, the first one in
arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c and the last one in
include/asm-powerpc/rwsem.h.
Is this the right behaviour?

Regards,

--
Luca
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/