Re: Suspend2-2.2.2 for 2.6.16.

[Nigel Cunningham]

Hi.

On Thursday 30 March 2006 21:55, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > > Please do try code at suspend.sf.net. It should be as fast and not
> > > > > needing big kernel patch.
> > > >
> > > > Don't bother suggesting that to x86_64 owners: compilation is
> > > > currently broken in vbetool/lrmi.c (at least).
> > >
> > > It seems to work at least for some users. I do not have x86-64 machine
> > > easily available, so someone else will have to fix that one.
> > >
> > > (Also it should be possible to compile suspend without s2ram support,
> > > avoiding the problem).
> >
> > I just found the line saying pciutils-devel is needed. Maybe that will
> > make the difference.
>
> I do not see missing includes, so I'm not sure it will help. Can you
> try adding
>
> ARCH=x86_64
>
> to Makefile?

Heh. It worked. Maybe you should have something to figure out what arch the 
user is using :) It seems a bit strange to tell the compiler that I'm using 
the arch it ought to know I'm using.

Regards,

Nigel

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature