Re: NFS client (10x) performance regression 2.6.14.7 -> 2.6.15

[Jakob Oestergaard]

On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 08:06:32AM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 14:45 +0200, Jakob Oestergaard wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 07:22:50AM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> > ...
> > > 
> > > Some nfsstat output comparing the good and bad cases would help.
> > 
> > Clean boot on 2.6.15 and 2.6.14.7, one run of nfsbench with
> > LEADING_EMPTY_SPACE=1.  I've skipped the NFS v2 stats because they're
> > all 0.
> 
> Why all the GETATTR calls?

That's the $1000 question I guess :)

> Are you running with 'noac' set?

I didn't set it, that's for sure :)  I got the option lines from
/proc/mounts, if there is any way I can get more/other information
please advise.

2.6.14.7:
 rw,v3,rsize=32768,wsize=32768,hard,intr,udp,lock,addr=...

2.6.15:
 rw,v3,rsize=32768,wsize=32768,hard,intr,lock,proto=udp,addr=...

Except for some formatting (proto=udp insted of udp) I fail to see any
difference.

The way I see it, it seems like caching on the client side fails
completely if the read requests are not aligned (to some
buffer/block/page/whatever).

> I don't have a 2.6.15 kernel to run with, but on a recent git pull, I
> get a total of 6 GETATTR calls when I run your nfsbench program.

The performance regression is present on 2.6.16.1 too.

Do you have a released kernel you can test with (2.6.1[56].*), or can I
somehow get the kernel you're testing with, just so that we test on the
same kernel?

> The number of READ calls is 1, and the number of WRITE calls is 161 (I'm
> running with 64k wsize).

I can't set 64k wsize:

puffin:~# mount -o rw,wsize=65536,udp sparrow:/exported/joe /mnt
puffin:~# cat /proc/mounts 
...
sparrow:/exported/joe /mnt nfs rw,v3,rsize=32768,wsize=32768,hard,intr,lock,proto=udp,addr=sparrow 0 0
puffin:~#

Server is running a patched 2.6.11.11 kernel - could that be what's
preventing me from 64k wsize?

What happens if you run with 32k rsize/wsize?

-- 

 / jakob

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/