[PATCH 2/10] fuse: fix fuse_dev_poll() return value
From: Miklos Szeredi
Date: Fri Mar 31 2006 - 12:45:51 EST
fuse_dev_poll() returned an error value instead of a poll mask.
Luckily (or unluckily) -ENODEV does contain the POLLERR bit.
There's also a race if filesystem is unmounted between fuse_get_conn()
and spin_lock(), in which case this event will be missed by poll().
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx>
Index: linux/fs/fuse/dev.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/fs/fuse/dev.c 2006-03-31 18:55:11.000000000 +0200
+++ linux/fs/fuse/dev.c 2006-03-31 18:55:30.000000000 +0200
@@ -804,17 +804,18 @@ static ssize_t fuse_dev_write(struct fil
static unsigned fuse_dev_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
{
- struct fuse_conn *fc = fuse_get_conn(file);
unsigned mask = POLLOUT | POLLWRNORM;
-
+ struct fuse_conn *fc = fuse_get_conn(file);
if (!fc)
- return -ENODEV;
+ return POLLERR;
poll_wait(file, &fc->waitq, wait);
spin_lock(&fuse_lock);
- if (!list_empty(&fc->pending))
- mask |= POLLIN | POLLRDNORM;
+ if (!fc->connected)
+ mask = POLLERR;
+ else if (!list_empty(&fc->pending))
+ mask |= POLLIN | POLLRDNORM;
spin_unlock(&fuse_lock);
return mask;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/