Re: smp_locks reference_discarded errors

[Sam Ravnborg]

On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 09:08:51PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 06:10:55PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 10:40:42AM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > 
> > > came out of a 'make buildcheck' a day or two ago (the following day,
> > > Sam nuked reference_discarded.pl in favour of it being done
> > > magically somewhere else (I've not looked into how its done now).
> > The check is part of modpost now. modpost is only used when building
> > modules but that holds true for most builds anyway therefore I did not
> > move it to a separate executable.
> >...
> 
> This doesn't sound good.
> 
> This means that we have no longer any tool that warns us about e.g. 
> references from non-__exit code to __exit code [1]?
> [1] __exit, not __{dev,cpu,mem}exit

It does warn for this also. The test I have carried out has mostly been
on allmodconfig builds though. I assume you are worried for the case
when a module is built-in and the __exit section is discarded - or?

	Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/