On Fri, Mar 31 2006, Jeff Garzik wrote:Jens Axboe wrote:On Fri, Mar 31 2006, Arjan van de Ven wrote:Why? We don't usually restrict filesystems in such ways... I would rather a binary-only module reference generic_file_splice_read() than create its own.On Thu, 2006-03-30 at 23:06 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:Yes they should, I'll add that to the current splice tree.Woe be unto he who builds their filesystems as modules.since splice support is highly linux specific and new.. shouldn't these
be _GPL exports?
You could use that very same argument for any piece of the kernel, then,
so I don't think that adds much value to _not_ exporting it GPL.