Re: Handling devices that don't have a bus

[David Brownell]

On Saturday 01 April 2006 8:46 am, Alan Stern wrote:

> I think you have misunderstood my point.  Yes, devices are part of the
> platform bus only if they explicitly want to be.  My point was that even
> though they _do_ want to be on the platform bus, 

I'm not clear on why it would want to be on the platform bus;
what would its inner platform-ness consist of?

There really isn't a "bus" that makes much sense for such a
singleton device to sit on.  


> in this situation they 
> _can't_ because they are forced to register a struct device, not a struct
> platform_device.  The choice is not up to the driver; it is determined by
> the USB Gadget framework. 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/