Re: [2.6.16 PATCH] Filessytem Events Reporter V2

[Yi Yang]

Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 09:21:26PM +0800, Yi Yang (yang.y.yi@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:
>   
> > Compared with Filesystem Events Reporter v1, the following changes are done:
> >   - Use workqueue/keventd instead of kfseventd. 
> >   - fsevent_mask can be set by sysctl and proc
> >     interface.
> >   - Add missed spinlock
> >   - Ensure fsevent sequence number is uniqe
> >
> > This patch implements a filsystem events report facitily, Filesystem Events
> > Reporter, the user can monitor filesystem activities via it, currently, it
> >  can monitor access, attribute change, open, create, modify, delete,
> >  move and close of any file or directory as well as mount/umount.
> >     
>
> Comments below.
>
> ...
>   
> > +
> > +static int fsevent_ack(enum fsevent_type type, pid_t pid, u32 seq)
> > +{
> > +	struct fsevent *event;
> > +	unsigned int size;
> > +	struct sk_buff * skb = NULL;
> > +	struct nlmsghdr * nlhdr = NULL;
> > +
> > +	size = NLMSG_SPACE(sizeof(struct fsevent));
> > +	                                                                                                                                       
> > +	skb = alloc_skb(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	if (!skb)
> > +	        return -ENOMEM;
> > +	                                                                                                                                       
> > +	nlhdr = NLMSG_PUT(skb, 0, seq, NLMSG_DONE, size - sizeof(*nlhdr));
> > +	event = NLMSG_DATA(nlhdr);
> > +
> > +	ktime_get_ts(&event->timestamp);
> > +	event->cpu = -1;
> > +	event->type = type; 
> > +	event->pid = 0;
> > +	event->uid = 0;
> > +	event->gid = 0;
> > +	event->len = 0;
> > +	event->pname_len = 0;
> > +	event->fname_len = 0;
> > +	event->new_fname_len = 0;
> > +	event->err = 0;
> > +	                                                                                                                                       
> > +	NETLINK_CB(skb).dst_group = 0;
> > +	NETLINK_CB(skb).dst_pid = pid;
> > +	NETLINK_CB(skb).pid = 0;
> > +
> > +	return (netlink_unicast(fsevent_sock, skb, pid, MSG_DONTWAIT));
> >     
>
> netlink_unicast() uses boolean value but ont MSG_* flags for nonblocking, 
> so this should be netlink_unicast(fsevent_sock, skb, pid, 0);
>   
a example invocation in file net/netlink/af_netlink.c:
netlink_unicast(in_skb->sk, skb, NETLINK_CB(in_skb).pid, MSG_DONTWAIT);
so, it hasn't any problem.
>   
> > +nlmsg_failure:
> > +	kfree_skb(skb);
> > +	return -1;
> > +}
> >     
>
> ...
>
>   
> > +static void fsevent_recv(struct sock *sk, int len)
> > +{
> > +	struct sk_buff *skb = NULL;
> > +	struct nlmsghdr *nlhdr = NULL;
> > +	struct fsevent_filter * filter = NULL;
> > +	pid_t pid;
> > +
> > +	while ((skb = skb_dequeue(&sk->sk_receive_queue)) != NULL) {
> > +		skb_get(skb);
> > +		if (skb->len >= FSEVENT_FILTER_MSGSIZE) {
> > +			nlhdr = (struct nlmsghdr *)skb->data;
> > +			filter = NLMSG_DATA(nlhdr);
> > +			pid = NETLINK_CREDS(skb)->pid;
> > +			if (find_fsevent_listener(pid) == NULL)
> > +				atomic_inc(&fsevent_listener_num);
> > +			set_fsevent_filter(filter, pid);
> >     
>
> What is the logic behind this steps?
> If there are no listeners you increment it's number no matter if it will
> or not be added in set_fsevent_filter().
>   
fsevent_recv is used to receive listener's commands, a listener must 
send commands in order to get fsevents it
interests, so this is the best point to increment number of listeners. 
set_fsevent_filter will add listener to listener
list, so it is OK.
>   
> > +		}
> > +		kfree_skb(skb);
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> > +#define DEFINE_FILTER_MATCH_FUNC(filtertype, key) 			\
> > +	static int match_##filtertype(listener * p,			\
> > +				struct fsevent * event,			\
> > +				struct sk_buff * skb)			\
> > +	{								\
> > +		int ret = 0;						\
> > +		filtertype * xfilter = NULL;				\
> > +		struct sk_buff * skb2 = NULL;				\
> > +		struct list_head *  head = &(p->key##_filter_list_head);  \
> > +		list_for_each_entry(xfilter, head, list) {		\
> > +			if (xfilter->key != event->key)			\
> > +				continue;				\
> > +			ret = filter_fsevent(xfilter->mask, event->type); \
> > +			if ( ret != 0)					\
> > +				return -1;				\
> > +			skb2 = skb_clone(skb, GFP_KERNEL);		\
> > +       			if (skb2 == NULL)				\
> > +				return -ENOMEM;				\
> > +			NETLINK_CB(skb2).dst_group = 0;			\
> > +			NETLINK_CB(skb2).dst_pid = p->pid;		\
> > +			NETLINK_CB(skb2).pid = 0;			\
> > +			return (netlink_unicast(fsevent_sock, skb2,	\
> > +					p->pid, MSG_DONTWAIT));		\
> >     
>
> The same issue about nonblocking sending.
>
>   
> > +		}							\
> > +		return -ENODEV;						\
> > +	}								\
> > +
> > +DEFINE_FILTER_MATCH_FUNC(pid_filter, pid)
> > +
> > +DEFINE_FILTER_MATCH_FUNC(uid_filter, uid)
> > +
> > +DEFINE_FILTER_MATCH_FUNC(gid_filter, gid)
> > +
> > +#define MATCH_XID(key, listenerp, event, skb) 			\
> > +	ret = match_##key##_filter(listenerp, event, skb); 	\
> > +	if (ret == 0) {					 	\
> > +		kfree_skb(skb);				 	\
> > +	        continue;				 	\
> > +	}						 	\
> > +	do {} while (0)					 	\
> > +
> > +static int fsevent_send_to_process(struct sk_buff * skb)
> > +{
> > +	listener * p  = NULL, * q = NULL;
> > +	struct fsevent * event = NULL;
> > +	struct sk_buff * skb2 = NULL;
> > +	int ret = 0;
> > +
> > +	event = (struct fsevent *)(skb->data + sizeof(struct nlmsghdr));
> > +	spin_lock(&listener_list_lock);
> > +	list_for_each_entry_safe(p, q, &listener_list_head, list) {
> > +		MATCH_XID(pid, p, event, skb);
> > +		MATCH_XID(uid, p, event, skb);
> > +		MATCH_XID(gid, p, event, skb);
> > +
> > +		if (filter_fsevent(p->mask, event->type) == 0) {
> > +			 skb2 = skb_clone(skb, GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	                 if (skb2 == NULL)
> > +	                 	return -ENOMEM;
> > +	                 NETLINK_CB(skb2).dst_group = 0;
> > +	                 NETLINK_CB(skb2).dst_pid = p->pid;
> > +	                 NETLINK_CB(skb2).pid = 0;
> > +	                 ret = netlink_unicast(fsevent_sock, skb2,
> > +	                                p->pid, MSG_DONTWAIT);
> > +			if (ret == -ECONNREFUSED) {
> > +				atomic_dec(&fsevent_listener_num);
> > +				cleanup_dead_listener(p);
> > +			}
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +	spin_unlock(&listener_list_lock);
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void fsevent_commit(void * unused)
> > +{
> > +	struct sk_buff * skb = NULL;
> > +		
> > +	while((skb = skb_dequeue(&get_cpu_var(fsevent_send_queue)))
> > +		!= NULL) {
> > +		fsevent_send_to_process(skb);
> > +		put_cpu_var(fsevent_send_queue);
> > +	}
> > +}
> >     
>
> Really strange mix of per-cpu variables for optimized performance and
> global spin locking.
> Consider using RCU for list of listeners.
>   
per cpu queue is used to avoid raise_fsevent to contend spinlock, but 
listener_list_lock just is used
to synchronize the operations of userspace applications(listener) on 
listener list, it just protect listener
list.

Of course, your advice is good, RCU will be better, I'm considering 
substitute spinlock with RCU,
maybe list*_rcu  functions can help me.
> You use unicast delivery for netlink messages. 
> According to my investigation [1], it's performance is better only when
> there is only one listener (or maybe two in some cases), but then it is
> noticebly slower than broadcasting.
>
> 1. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&m=114424884216006&w=2
>   
Because fsevent has to deliver different events to different listeners, 
so I must use netlink_unicast,
in fact, netlink_broadcast also must send skb to every member of the 
group, so in my opinion,
they haven't  big difference.

Can you explain why there is such a big difference between 
netlink_unicast and netlink_broadcast?
>   
> > +static struct ctl_table fsevent_mask_sysctl[] = {
> > +	{
> > +		.ctl_name = FSEVENT_MASK_CTL_NAME,
> > +		.procname = "fsevent_mask",
> > +		.data = &fsevents_mask,
> > +		.maxlen = sizeof(u32),
> > +		.mode = 0644,
> > +		.proc_handler = &proc_dointvec,
> > +	},
> > +	{ .ctl_name = 0 }
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct ctl_table fs_root_sysctl[] = {
> > +	{
> > +		.ctl_name = CTL_FS,
> > +		.procname = "fs",
> > +		.mode = 0555,
> > +		.child = fsevent_mask_sysctl,
> > +	},
> > +	{ .ctl_name = 0 }
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int __init fsevent_init(void)
> > +{
> > +	int cpu;
> > +	struct sk_buff_head * listptr;
> > +	struct work_struct * workptr;
> > +
> > +	fsevent_sock = netlink_kernel_create(NETLINK_FSEVENT, 0,
> > +					 fsevent_recv, THIS_MODULE);
> > +	if (!fsevent_sock)
> > +		return -EIO;
> > +	for_each_cpu(cpu) {
> > +		listptr = &per_cpu(fsevent_send_queue, cpu);
> > +		skb_queue_head_init(listptr);
> > +		workptr = &per_cpu(fsevent_work, cpu);
> > +		INIT_WORK(workptr, fsevent_commit, NULL);
> > +	}
> >     
>
> Btw, you need some rebalancing of the per-cpu queues, probably in
> keventd, since CPUs can go offline and your messages will stuck foreve
> there.
>   
Does keventd not do it? if so, keventd should be modified.
>   
> > +	if (register_sysctl_table(fs_root_sysctl, 0) == NULL)
> > +                return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void __exit fsevent_exit(void)
> > +{
> > +	listener * p = NULL, * q = NULL;
> > +	sock_release(fsevent_sock->sk_socket);
> > +	spin_lock(&listener_list_lock);
> > +	list_for_each_entry_safe(p, q, &listener_list_head, list) {
> > +		cleanup_dead_listener(p);
> > +	}
> > +	spin_unlock(&listener_list_lock);
> >     
>
> Broken. Your work can be pending on this stage, but you already removed
> and freed resources.
>   
Sorry, I don't consider it, I will add it, thank you very much.
>   
> > +}
> > +
> > +module_init(fsevent_init);
> > +module_exit(fsevent_exit);
> > +
> > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Yi Yang <yang.y.yi@xxxxxxxxx>");
> > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("File System Events Reporter");
> >
> >     
>
>   

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/