Re: [PATCH -rt] Buggy uart (for 2.6.16)

[Robert Hancock]

Steven Rostedt wrote:
> I just found some more information.   The board's chipset is an Intel
> 440BX.  I think this is responsible for the uarts.

No, it would be whatever Super I/O chip is present on the board.

--
Robert Hancock      Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/