Re: [PATCH] Use atomic ops for file_nr accounting, not spinlock+irq

[Trond Myklebust]

On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 19:19 +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > I've been updating the NFS git tree on a daily basis. I'm not going to
> > begin pulling from the -mm tree, though.
> 
> The thing to which I refer is in Linus's tree but wasn't in yours this
> morning.  Unfortunately, this means my patch has to be different, depending on
> whose tree I'm using... although your tree has been updated since then, so the
> difference seems to have gone away.
> 
> I don't mean to be critical of your efforts, but the requirement imposed by
> Andrew that I have to base my tree on yours makes things a little tricky
> sometimes:-/

You can always pull from Linus too. There is nothing within git that
forces you to wait for me to pull in his changes.

Cheers,
  Trond

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/