Re: C++ pushback
From: Avi Kivity
Date: Tue Apr 25 2006 - 05:00:44 EST
Martin Mares wrote:
That seems to be a case against writing functions.
Why is a C function acceptable where a C++ constructor isn't?
Because examining a single constructor is not enough -- you need to
check constructors of all objects contained within the object you
initialize.
Calling a C function is simple and explicit -- a quick glance over
the code is enough to tell what gets called.
No, you need to check all the functions it calls as well.
But I agree that C is more explicit than C++.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/