Re: question about nfs_execute_read: why do we need to do lock_kernel?

[Peter Staubach]

Xin Zhao wrote:

> Thanks for your reply. So the only reason is for rpc auditing? If so,
> why not just lock the code that updating the audit information? Now
> the code is:
>
> lock_kernel()
> rpc_execute()
> unlock_kernel().
>
> That means the kernel will be blocked when rpc is executed, which
> could take long time. Even if rpc_execute() won't take very long, this
> implementation still looks inefficient. That's why I am a little
> confused on this point.
>
> Any further thought?

I would suggest looking at the semantics of the BKL.  They don't end up
implying what you are suggesting.  The kernel isn't really locked for
the duration of the over the wire RPC.

   Thanx...

      ps
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/