[PATCH][delayacct] Fix the timespec_sub() interface (was Re: [Patch 1/8] Setup)

[Balbir Singh]

On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 02:17:13PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >  /*
> > + * sub = end - start, in normalized form
> > + */
> > +static inline void timespec_sub(struct timespec *start, struct timespec *end,
> > +				struct timespec *sub)
> > +{
> > +	set_normalized_timespec(sub, end->tv_sec - start->tv_sec,
> > +				end->tv_nsec - start->tv_nsec);
> > +}
> 
> The interface might not be right here.
> 
> - I think "lhs" and "rhs" would be better names than "start" and "end". 
>   After all, we don't _know_ that the caller is using the two times as a
>   start and an end.  The caller might be taking the difference between two
>   differences, for example.
> 
> - The existing timespec and timeval funtions tend to do return-by-value. 
>   So this would become
> 
> 	static inline struct timespec timespec_sub(struct timespec lhs,
> 							struct timespec rhs)
> 
>   (and given that it's inlined, the added overhead of passing the
>   arguments by value will be zero)
> 
> - If we don't want to do that then at least let's get the arguments in a
>   sane order:
> 
> 	static inline void timespec_sub(struct timespec *result,
> 				struct timespec lhs, struct timespec rhs)
> 

Hi, Andrew,

Please find the updated patch, which changes the interface of timespec_sub()
as suggested in the review comments

Changelog

1. Change the interface of timespec_sub() to return by value and rename
   the arguments. Use lhs,rhs instead of end,start

Changes under consideration

1. Migrate to the ktime interface (Thomas Gleixner)

	Balbir Singh,
	Linux Technology Center,
	IBM Software Labs


Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxx>
---

 include/linux/time.h |   12 +++++++-----
 kernel/delayacct.c   |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff -puN include/linux/time.h~timespec-sub-return-by-value include/linux/time.h
--- linux-2.6.17-rc3/include/linux/time.h~timespec-sub-return-by-value	2006-05-10 12:03:11.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.17-rc3-balbir/include/linux/time.h	2006-05-10 12:26:44.000000000 +0530
@@ -68,13 +68,15 @@ extern unsigned long mktime(const unsign
 extern void set_normalized_timespec(struct timespec *ts, time_t sec, long nsec);
 
 /*
- * sub = end - start, in normalized form
+ * sub = lhs - rhs, in normalized form
  */
-static inline void timespec_sub(struct timespec *start, struct timespec *end,
-				struct timespec *sub)
+static inline struct timespec timespec_sub(struct timespec *lhs,
+						struct timespec *rhs)
 {
-	set_normalized_timespec(sub, end->tv_sec - start->tv_sec,
-				end->tv_nsec - start->tv_nsec);
+	struct timespec ts_delta;
+	set_normalized_timespec(&ts_delta, lhs->tv_sec - rhs->tv_sec,
+				lhs->tv_nsec - rhs->tv_nsec);
+	return ts_delta;
 }
 
 /*
diff -puN kernel/delayacct.c~timespec-sub-return-by-value kernel/delayacct.c
--- linux-2.6.17-rc3/kernel/delayacct.c~timespec-sub-return-by-value	2006-05-10 12:03:38.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.17-rc3-balbir/kernel/delayacct.c	2006-05-10 14:29:28.000000000 +0530
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static inline void delayacct_end(struct 
 	s64 ns;
 
 	do_posix_clock_monotonic_gettime(end);
-	timespec_sub(&ts, start, end);
+	ts = timespec_sub(end, start);
 	ns = timespec_to_ns(&ts);
 	if (ns < 0)
 		return;
_
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/