Re: [PATCH -mm] sys_semctl gcc 4.1 warning fix

[Daniel Walker]

On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 16:39 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Mer, 2006-05-10 at 08:06 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > > Because while the warning is present people will check it now and again.
> > 
> > But it's pointless to review it, in this case and for this warning .
> 
> Then why did you review it ? 

So I wouldn't have to see that warning again ..

> It reminds people that it does need checking, and ensures now and then
> people do check that there isn't actually a bug there.

I don't see a reason why it needs checking .. People are just going to
spin their wheel reviewing code that's been reviewed .. Maybe someone
like me will write a patch to fix this warning , and we'll see this
process happening all over again ..

Daniel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/