Re: rt20 patch question

[Mark Hounschell]

Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Wow! I asked for some info on your system, and boy, did I get info! :)
> 

Sorry. I talk to much.

>> I can only say for sure that I do not have these "stops" when running
>> any other kernel or when running the rt20 kernel in any of the
>> non-complete preemption modes.
>>

Configured for "Preempable Kernel" I got the following but no "stops"
came with it.

BUG: scheduling while atomic: softirq-timer/1/0x00000100/15
caller is schedule+0x33/0xf0
 [<b0309acc>] __schedule+0x517/0x95b (8)
 [<f09d7627>] mdio_ctrl+0xaa/0x135 [e100] (48)
 [<f09d7627>] mdio_ctrl+0xaa/0x135 [e100] (12)
 [<b030a06c>] schedule+0x33/0xf0 (36)
 [<b012eee5>] prepare_to_wait+0x12/0x4f (8)
 [<b0142318>] synchronize_irq+0x96/0xba (20)
 [<b012eda0>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x37 (12)
 [<f0a13677>] vortex_timer+0xa0/0x563 [3c59x] (24)
 [<b0125b76>] __mod_timer+0x8c/0xc3 (12)
 [<f09d8998>] e100_watchdog+0x0/0x39c [e100] (24)
 [<b030a4cf>] cond_resched_softirq+0x64/0xaa (8)
 [<b02a2dcd>] dev_watchdog+0x77/0xac (4)
 [<f0a135d7>] vortex_timer+0x0/0x563 [3c59x] (12)
 [<b0125902>] run_timer_softirq+0x1bf/0x3a7 (8)
 [<b0121960>] ksoftirqd+0x112/0x1cc (52)
 [<b012184e>] ksoftirqd+0x0/0x1cc (52)
 [<b012eb9c>] kthread+0xc2/0xc6 (4)
 [<b012eada>] kthread+0x0/0xc6 (12)
 [<b0100e35>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0xb (16)

Mark

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/