Re: [RFC PATCH 34/35] Add the Xen virtual network device driver.

[Herbert Xu]

On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 08:49:04AM +0100, Keir Fraser wrote:
> 
> The alternatives are unattractive:
>  1. We have no good way to distinguish interrupts caused by packets 
> from local VMs versus packets from remote hosts. Both get muxed on the 
> same virtual interface.
>  2. An entropy front/back is tricky -- how do we decide how much 
> entropy to pull from domain0? How much should domain0 be prepared to 
> give other domains? How easy is it to DoS domain0 by draining its 
> entropy pool? Yuk.

IMHO there just isn't enough real entropy to go around in one physical
machine without a proper HRNG.  So either use urandom in all the guests
or for those that really have to use /dev/random, install a hardware
RNG (or wait for it :).

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/