Re: swapping and oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x201d2, order=0
From: Al Boldi
Date: Sat May 13 2006 - 08:13:04 EST
Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 15:17 +0300, Al Boldi wrote:
> > Note that this is not specific to mem=8M, but rather a general oom
> > observation even for mem=4G, where it is only much later to occur.
>
> An oom situation with 4G ram would be more interesting than this one.
Agreed, but can you tell me what readahead has to do with this oom?
oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x201d2, order=0
[<c013ff25>] out_of_memory+0xa5/0xc0
[<c0141099>] __alloc_pages+0x279/0x310
[<c0143669>] __do_page_cache_readahead+0xe9/0x120
[<c0143b3f>] max_sane_readahead+0x2f/0x50
[<c013d8cb>] filemap_nopage+0x2eb/0x370
[<c0149ea5>] do_no_page+0x65/0x220
[<c014a1dc>] __handle_mm_fault+0xec/0x200
[<c0113258>] do_page_fault+0x188/0x5c5
[<c01130d0>] do_page_fault+0x0/0x5c5
[<c0103a0f>] error_code+0x4f/0x54
Thanks!
--
Al
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/