[PATCH] x86 NUMA panic compile error

[Andy Whitcroft]

Is this check now needed given we have the zone alignment patches in
this -mm also?  I think we want to make it at least possible to
boot such a kernel on a 'flat' machine.

-apw

=== 8< ===
x86 NUMA panic compile error

Seem we have a syntax error rising from the the new panic added
to let people know NUMA didn't work on physically non-numa hardware.

Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 srat.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -upN reference/arch/i386/kernel/srat.c current/arch/i386/kernel/srat.c
--- reference/arch/i386/kernel/srat.c
+++ current/arch/i386/kernel/srat.c
@@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ int __init get_memcfg_from_srat(void)
 	extern int use_cyclone;
 	if (use_cyclone == 0) {
 		/* Make sure user sees something */
-		static const char s[] __initdata = "Not an IBM x440/NUMAQ. Don't use i386 CONFIG_NUMA anywhere else."
+		static const char s[] __initdata = "Not an IBM x440/NUMAQ. Don't use i386 CONFIG_NUMA anywhere else.";
 		early_printk(s);
 		panic(s);
 	}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/