Re: [PATCH] rtc subsystem, use ENOIOCTLCMD where appropriate

[Ingo Oeser]

Hi Hans Peter,

H. Peter Anvin wrote
> ENOIOCTLCMD is right here, *except* in the very last hunk, because
> it's a request to the upper layers to emulate the operation:

So would a patch like this be welcome and clear this up?

diff --git a/include/linux/errno.h b/include/linux/errno.h
index d90b80f..d33ae4b 100644
--- a/include/linux/errno.h
+++ b/include/linux/errno.h
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
 #define ERESTARTSYS	512
 #define ERESTARTNOINTR	513
 #define ERESTARTNOHAND	514	/* restart if no handler.. */
-#define ENOIOCTLCMD	515	/* No ioctl command */
+#define ENOIOCTLCMD	515	/* No ioctl command, upper layer please emulate or pass ENOTTY to user space */
 #define ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK 516 /* restart by calling sys_restart_syscall */
 
 /* Defined for the NFSv3 protocol */


Regards

Ingo Oeser
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/