Re: IA32 syscall 311 not implemented on x86_64

From: Adrian Bunk
Date: Sun May 21 2006 - 15:37:39 EST


On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 02:56:10PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
>
> Actually it is kinda throttled, but only on process name.
> This patch just removes that stuff completely.
> (Also removes a bunch of trailing whitespace)
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> --- linux-2.6.16.noarch/arch/x86_64/ia32/sys_ia32.c~ 2006-05-21 14:50:57.000000000 -0400
> +++ linux-2.6.16.noarch/arch/x86_64/ia32/sys_ia32.c 2006-05-21 14:51:48.000000000 -0400
> @@ -522,17 +522,9 @@ sys32_waitpid(compat_pid_t pid, unsigned
> }
>
> int sys32_ni_syscall(int call)
> -{
> - struct task_struct *me = current;
> - static char lastcomm[sizeof(me->comm)];
> -
> - if (strncmp(lastcomm, me->comm, sizeof(lastcomm))) {
> - printk(KERN_INFO "IA32 syscall %d from %s not implemented\n",
> - call, me->comm);
> - strncpy(lastcomm, me->comm, sizeof(lastcomm));
> - }
> - return -ENOSYS;
> -}
> +{
> + return -ENOSYS;
> +}
>...

Why can't we remove sys32_ni_syscall() and call sys_ni_syscall()
instead if all we want to do is to return -ENOSYS?

cu
Adrian

--

"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/