Re: OpenGL-based framebuffer concepts

[Alan Cox]

On Maw, 2006-05-23 at 10:10 -0400, Kyle Moffett wrote:
> A GPU which does not support OpenGL at all would look virtually  

No GPU today "supports" OpenGL

> 2)  Client program sends OpenGL commands through kernel framebuffer  
> device.
> 3)  Kernel either passes the OpenGL commands to the GPU or if they  
> were trapped by the software renderer it passes them to that, which  
> can emulate them using more primitive operations.

You've no idea how a GPU works have you ?

The process generally goes something like this.

I build an OpenGL rendering context.
The supporting library JITs an engine which implements this rendering
context and pipeline. Only a JIT is really fast enough because there are
so many tests are otherwise involved.

Each poly is fired down the JIT engine which produces a mix of
	- AGP command streams
	- GPU bytecodes
	- Polygon breakdowns which go back into the engine
		(eg for clips the chip can't do)
	- Texture loads and swaps

The GPU view of the universe is far far from the OpenGL one. With the
possible exception of the big 3D Labs cards anyway.

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/