Re: [patch] fix smt nice lock contention and optimization

[Con Kolivas]

On Saturday 03 June 2006 18:12, Chen, Kenneth W wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote on Saturday, June 03, 2006 12:58 AM
>
> > * Con Kolivas <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Could we make this neater with extra braces such as:
> > >
> > >  	for_each_domain(this_cpu, tmp) {
> > > 		if (tmp->flags & SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER) {
> > >  			sd = tmp;
> > > 			break;
> > > 		}
> > > 	}
> > >
> > > and same for the other uses of for_each ? I know it's redundant but
> > > it's neater IMO when there are multiple lines of code below it.
> >
> > yep, that's the preferred style when there are multiple lines below a
> > loop.
>
> OK, thanks for the tips.  Here is an incremental coding-style fix:

Great!

Thanks Chris, Nick and Ken for your input.

Signed-off-by: Con Kolivas <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
for both

-- 
-ck
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/