Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC 3/5] sched: Add CPU rate hard caps

[Con Kolivas]

On Tuesday 06 June 2006 18:24, Kirill Korotaev wrote:
> >>I'm sorry, but nice never looked "nice" to me.
> >>Have you ever tried to "nice" apache server which spawns 500
> >>processes/threads on a loaded machine?
> >>With nice you _can't_ impose limits or priority on the whole "apache".
> >>The more apaches you have the more useless their priorites and nices
> >> are...
> >
> > Yes but interactive admin processes will still get a large bonus
> > relative to the apache processes so you can still log in and kill the
> > apache storm off even with very large loads.
>
> And how do you plan to manage it: to log in every time when apache works
> too much and kill processes? The managabiliy of such solutions sucks..

What a strange discussion. I simply impose limits on processes and connections 
on my grossly underpowered server.

/me shrugs

-- 
-ck
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/