Re: 2.6.18 -mm merge plans

[Christoph Hellwig]

> ecryptfs-crypto-functions.patch
> ecryptfs-debug-functions.patch
> ecryptfs-alpha-build-fix.patch
> ecryptfs-convert-assert-to-bug_on.patch
> ecryptfs-remove-unnecessary-null-checks.patch
> ecryptfs-rewrite-ecryptfs_fsync.patch
> ecryptfs-overhaul-file-locking.patch
> 
>  Christoph has half-reviewed this and all the issues arising from that
>  have, I believe, been addressed.  With the exception of the "we should
>  have a generic stacking layer" issue.  Which is true.  Michael's take is
>  "yes, but that's not my job".  Which also is true.

It's far from ready.  There's various things that simply can't be done
properly in a lowlevel fs or abosulutely shouldn't.  And I think a few
uniqueue gems in there.   Most urgent thing of course is that we somehow
need to deal with the idiocy of the nameidata passed into most namespace
methods.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/