Re: [ckpatch][15/29] hz-no_default_250.patch

[Jan Engelhardt]

>
>Yes I stored a family of these values and 864 was ~ the optimum for a high 
>value for desktops and ~84 for a low value but were unpopular for not being 

82 IIRC.

>something decimally familiar. Also lots of code kind of broke with values 
>below 100 in the kernel.

Ought to be fixed. Just like the code which assumed 100 Hz and broke during 
the initial switch to 1000, before we went back again to 250. :p


Jan Engelhardt
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/