Why is activate_task() used in __migrate_task()?

[Peter Williams]

It would seem to me that using activate_task() in __migrate_task() in 
lieu of __activate_task() has two undesirable consequences: 1) 
recalculating and resetting prio and 2) resetting the time stamp.  The 
fact that the time stamp is adjusted for the change of run queue just 
before activate_task() is called reinforces my suspicion that these 
consequences are unintended.

Is there a reason for using activate_task() that I can't see?

Peter
--
Peter Williams                                   pwil3058@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
 -- Ambrose Bierce
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/