Possible bug in do_execve()
From: Sonny Rao
Date: Mon Jun 19 2006 - 22:24:08 EST
While doing some stress testing with a reduced number of MMU contexts,
I found that an error path in exec seemed to call destroy_context()
via mmdrop() immediately after init_new_context() failed.
specifically I got some warning from the idr code through powerpc
mmu_context code:
idr_remove called for id=0 which is not allocated.
Call Trace:
[C0000003C9E73820] [C00000000000E760] .show_stack+0x74/0x1b4 (unreliable)
[C0000003C9E738D0] [C000000000212F30] .idr_remove+0x1c4/0x274
[C0000003C9E73990] [C00000000002CA14] .destroy_context+0x2c/0x60
[C0000003C9E73A20] [C00000000004CDAC] .__mmdrop+0x50/0x80
[C0000003C9E73AB0] [C0000000000C9E38] .do_execve+0x218/0x290
[C0000003C9E73B60] [C00000000000F28C] .sys_execve+0x74/0xf8
[C0000003C9E73C00] [C00000000000871C] syscall_exit+0x0/0x40
--- Exception: c01 at .execve+0x8/0x14
LR = .____call_usermodehelper+0xdc/0xf4
[C0000003C9E73EF0] [C000000000065388] .____call_usermodehelper+0xb0/0xf4 (unreliable)
[C0000003C9E73F90] [C000000000023928] .kernel_thread+0x4c/0x68
Here's the code in do_execve():
retval = init_new_context(current, bprm->mm);
if (retval < 0)
goto out_mm
<snip>
out_mm:
if (bprm->mm)
mmdrop(bprm->mm);
mmdrop() then calls destroy_context().
There's a similar path in compat_do_execve().
Anton pointed out a comment in fork.c, which seems to inidcate
incorrect behavior in the exec code.
>From dup_mm() in fork.c:
if (init_new_context(tsk, mm))
goto fail_nocontext;
<snip>
fail_nocontext:
/*
* If init_new_context() failed, we cannot use mmput() to free the mm
* because it calls destroy_context()
*/
mm_free_pgd(mm);
free_mm(mm);
return NULL;
Is the behavior in do_execve() correct?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/