Re: [PATCH 1/5]: ufs: missed brelse and wrong baseblk

[Evgeniy Dushistov]

On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 08:13:06PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> Which is fsck-all protection, since then you proceed to do a lot of
> blocking operations.  Now, lock_super() down in balloc.c _might_ be
> enough, but I wouldn't bet on that.

There is still leak of proper locking model for inode's metadata,
for example we don't lock/unlock buffer_head when check if 
we've already allocated block or not,
so lock_kernel still necessary.

-- 
/Evgeniy

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/