RE: [patch 0/5] [PATCH,RFC] vfs: per-superblock unused dentries list (2nd version)

[Ravinandan Arakali]

Do you want the patch to be submitted to netdev(the mailing list that we
usually submit to) ?

Ravi

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Morton [mailto:akpm@xxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 5:37 PM
To: ravinandan.arakali@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; dgc@xxxxxxx; mingo@xxxxxxx; neilb@xxxxxxx;
jblunck@xxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
balbir@xxxxxxxxxx; ananda.raju@xxxxxxxxxxxx;
leonid.grossman@xxxxxxxxxxxx; Jes Sorensen
Subject: Re: [patch 0/5] [PATCH,RFC] vfs: per-superblock unused dentries
list (2nd version)


"Ravinandan Arakali" <ravinandan.arakali@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> This is a known problem and has been fixed in our internal source tree. We
> will be submitting the patch soon.

Please send me a copy asap - I urgently need to get the -mm patches vaguely
stabilised.

I'm somewhat surprised that the sn2 failed so seriously - I thought Jes was
testing that fairly regularly.

I think we kinda-sorta have a handle on the s2io->IRQ problem (although the
unexpectedly-held console spinlock is a mystery).

The scsi->BIO->mempool->slab crash is also a mystery.

Thanks.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/