On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:40:49 -0600 Jim Cromie wrote:oops :) I guess youll is just too visually grating
Randy.Dunlap wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:57:21 -0600 Jim Cromie wrote:are we talking apostrophes here, or division of labor ?
Andrew Morton wrote:WTH? "you'll" ??
On Sat, 17 Jun 2006 12:42:28 -0600OK. Just so Im clear, Ill patch against the tail of the set (ie -mm1), and you'll push them forward into the
Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Fixup patches agains next -mm would be suitable. Please keep them
super-short: basically one-patch-per-review-comment. That way I can easily
instertion-sort the patches into place and we retain a nice patch series.
If the latter, what have I missed ?
Andrew specifically said 'patch against next -mm', I intended to follow his instructions.
apostrophes :)
and ISTM that you didn't follow his request.are you referring to the replacement patch for 20/20 ?
---
~Randy