Re: [PATCH 2/3] FS_ENET: use PAL for mii management
From: Gerhard Jaeger
Date: Wed Jun 21 2006 - 03:19:35 EST
Hi,
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 16:58, Vitaly Bordug wrote:
>
> This patch should update the fs_enet infrastructure to utilize
> Phy Abstraction Layer subsystem. Inside there are generic driver rehaul,
> board-specific portion to respect driver changes (for 8272ads and 866ads).
>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Bordug <vbordug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> arch/ppc/platforms/mpc8272ads_setup.c | 154 ++++++----
> arch/ppc/platforms/mpc866ads_setup.c | 192 ++++++------
> arch/ppc/platforms/mpc885ads_setup.c | 179 ++++--------
> arch/ppc/syslib/mpc8xx_devices.c | 8 +
> arch/ppc/syslib/mpc8xx_sys.c | 6
> arch/ppc/syslib/pq2_devices.c | 5
> arch/ppc/syslib/pq2_sys.c | 3
> drivers/net/fs_enet/Makefile | 6
> drivers/net/fs_enet/fec.h | 42 +++
> drivers/net/fs_enet/fs_enet-main.c | 207 ++++++++-----
> drivers/net/fs_enet/fs_enet-mii.c | 507 ---------------------------------
> drivers/net/fs_enet/fs_enet.h | 40 ++-
> drivers/net/fs_enet/mac-fcc.c | 10 -
> drivers/net/fs_enet/mac-fec.c | 132 +--------
> drivers/net/fs_enet/mac-scc.c | 4
> drivers/net/fs_enet/mii-bitbang.c | 384 +++++++++++++++----------
> drivers/net/fs_enet/mii-fec.c | 243 ++++++++++++++++
> drivers/net/fs_enet/mii-fixed.c | 92 ------
> include/asm-ppc/mpc8260.h | 1
> include/asm-ppc/mpc8xx.h | 1
> include/linux/fs_enet_pd.h | 50 +--
> 21 files changed, 983 insertions(+), 1283 deletions(-)
[SNIPSNAP]
> diff --git a/drivers/net/fs_enet/mii-bitbang.c b/drivers/net/fs_enet/mii-bitbang.c
> index 24a5e2e..145bf4c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/fs_enet/mii-bitbang.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/fs_enet/mii-bitbang.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
> #include <linux/mii.h>
> #include <linux/ethtool.h>
> #include <linux/bitops.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>
> #include <asm/pgtable.h>
> #include <asm/irq.h>
> @@ -41,6 +42,7 @@
>
> #include "fs_enet.h"
>
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_8xx
> static int bitbang_prep_bit(u8 **dirp, u8 **datp, u8 *mskp, int port, int bit)
> {
> @@ -106,64 +108,25 @@ static int bitbang_prep_bit(u8 **dirp, u
> }
> #endif
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_8260
> -static int bitbang_prep_bit(u8 **dirp, u8 **datp, u8 *mskp, int port, int bit)
> +static int bitbang_prep_bit(u8 **datp, u8 *mskp,
> + struct fs_mii_bit *mii_bit)
is it possible, that in case of CONFIG_8xx you'll have two times this
bitbang_prep_bit() function?
Gerhard
--
Gerhard Jaeger <gjaeger@xxxxxxxxx>
SYSGO AG Embedded and Real-Time Software
www.sysgo.com | www.elinos.com | www.pikeos.com | www.osek.de
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/