Re: emergency or init=/bin/sh mode and terminal signals

[Samuel Thibault]

linux-os (Dick Johnson), le Wed 21 Jun 2006 07:53:12 -0400, a écrit :
> 
> On Mon, 19 Jun 2006, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> 
> > linux-os (Dick Johnson), le Mon 19 Jun 2006 07:37:02 -0400, a écrit :
> >> I don't think this is the correct behavior. You can't allow some
> >> terminal input to affect init. It has been the de facto standard
> >> in Unix, that the only time one should have a controlling terminal
> >> is after somebody logs in and owns something to control. If you want
> >> a controlling terminal from your emergency shell, please exec /bin/login.
> >
> > Ok, but people don't know that: they're given a shell, and wonder why on
> > hell ^C doesn't work...
> >
> > Samuel
> 
> Attached is a simple program called shell.

I already know how to write this.

The problem is not for _me_, it is for all these people that use
init=/bin/sh, and wonder why ^C doesn't work. Finding documentation on
such issue is not easy, so they'll most probably _not_ find out that
they need to use /sbin/sulogin, /bin/login, or even dig the linux-kernel
archives for your program. That's why I'm raising the issue at the
kernel level.

Samuel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/