Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/8] Inode diet v2

[Brian F. G. Bidulock]

Arjan,

On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> 
> for the inode slab it would very much make sense to tell the slab
> allocator to not do any kind of cacheline alignment at all, just because
> of the wasted space...

As the objects are an order of magnitude larger than the L1 cache slot,
it is fitting an integer multiple into a slab that is the limiting factor,
not really cacheline alignment.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/