Re: [PATCH] 64bit resources start end value fix

[Vivek Goyal]

On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 01:22:27PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 13:29:03 -0400
> Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Greg,
> > 
> > While changing 64bit kconfig options to CONFIG_RESOURCES_64BIT, I forgot
> > to update the values of start and end fields in ioport_resource and
> > iomem_resource.
> > 
> > Following patch applies on top of your reworked 64 bit patches and
> > is based on Andrew Morton's patch. Please apply.
> > 
> > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-mm-commits&m=115087406130723&w=2
> > 
> > Thanks
> > Vivek
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > o Update start and end fields for 32bit and 64bit resources.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > 
> >  linux-2.6.17-1M-vivek/kernel/resource.c |    6 +++---
> >  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff -puN kernel/resource.c~64bit-resources-start-end-value-fix kernel/resource.c
> > --- linux-2.6.17-1M/kernel/resource.c~64bit-resources-start-end-value-fix	2006-06-21 12:43:43.000000000 -0400
> > +++ linux-2.6.17-1M-vivek/kernel/resource.c	2006-06-21 12:44:59.000000000 -0400
> > @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
> >  
> >  struct resource ioport_resource = {
> >  	.name	= "PCI IO",
> > -	.start	= 0x0000,
> > +	.start	= 0,
> >  	.end	= IO_SPACE_LIMIT,
> >  	.flags	= IORESOURCE_IO,
> >  };
> > @@ -32,8 +32,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(ioport_resource);
> >  
> >  struct resource iomem_resource = {
> >  	.name	= "PCI mem",
> > -	.start	= 0UL,
> > -	.end	= ~0UL,
> > +	.start	= 0,
> > +	.end	= -1,
> >  	.flags	= IORESOURCE_MEM,
> >  };
> >  
> 
> Confused.  This patch won't apply.  It will apply with `patch -R', and if
> you do that you'll break iomem_reosurce.end by setting it to
> 0x00000000ffffffff.
> 
> I don't think any additional changes are needed here.

Andrew, you don't have to apply this patch. It is supposed to be picked
by Greg.

There seems to be some confusion. Just few days back Greg consolidated
and re-organized all the 64bit resources patches and posted on LKML for
review.

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=115015916118671&w=2

There were few review comments regarding kconfig options.
I reworked the patch and CONFING_RESOURCES_32BIT was changed to
CONFIG_RESOURCES_64BIT.

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=115072559700302&w=2

Now Greg's tree and your tree are not exact replica when it comes to 
64bit resource patches. Hence this patch is supposed to be picked by 
Greg to make sure things are not broken in his tree.

Thanks
Vivek
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/