On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 12:11:13 -0700
Jay Lan <jlan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Another observation that i considered bad news is that all
10 runs produced 1 to 5 recv() error with errno=105 (ENOBUF).
Well that's rather bad. AFAICT most of the allocations in there are
GFP_KERNEL, so why is this happening?
Because the kernel is producing netlink messages faster than userspace canHmm...possible. A quick check would be to reduce the frequency of exits and see.
consume them, perhaps?
If so, the sender needs to block, which means weWon't it suffice to make delivery of these stats best effort, with userspace dealing with missing data,
need to make reception of these stats a privileged operation?