Re: Why can't I set the priority of softirq-hrt? (Re: 2.6.17-rt1)
From: Esben Nielsen
Date: Wed Jun 21 2006 - 18:33:56 EST
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 22:29 +0100, Esben Nielsen wrote:
Find an version against the code in -mm below. Not too much tested yet.
What if setscheduler is called from interrup context as in the hrt timers?
It simply gets stuff going, nothing else.
What I mean is that we will then do the full priority inheritance boost
with interrupts off.
Before setscheduler() was O(1), now it is O(<lock depth of what ever lock
the target task might be locked on>).
This is not a problem for your use of setscheduler() as the task involved
only can be blocked on kernel mutexes, but when the function is used on a
userspace process the lock depth can be deep.
Esben
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/