Re: [PATCH] 64bit resources start end value fix

[Greg KH]

On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 04:27:15PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 19:15:52 -0400
> Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 01:58:55PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Andrew, you don't have to apply this patch. It is supposed to be picked
> > > > by Greg.
> > > > 
> > > > There seems to be some confusion. Just few days back Greg consolidated
> > > > and re-organized all the 64bit resources patches and posted on LKML for
> > > > review.
> > > > 
> > > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=115015916118671&w=2
> > > > 
> > > > There were few review comments regarding kconfig options.
> > > > I reworked the patch and CONFING_RESOURCES_32BIT was changed to
> > > > CONFIG_RESOURCES_64BIT.
> > > > 
> > > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=115072559700302&w=2
> > > > 
> > > > Now Greg's tree and your tree are not exact replica when it comes to 
> > > > 64bit resource patches. Hence this patch is supposed to be picked by 
> > > > Greg to make sure things are not broken in his tree.
> > > 
> > > I'm working against Greg's tree, always...
> > 
> > I am sorry. That's a mistake on my part. I misunderstood it.
> 
> Oh.
> 
> > Can you please include the attached patch.
> 
> Hopefully I'll pick it up from
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/gregkh/gregkh-2.6/gregkh-03-pci
> later today?

It will be tomorrow, sorry, catching up on other merge stuff...

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/