Re: 2.6.17-mm1 - possible recursive locking detected
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Thu Jun 22 2006 - 03:56:25 EST
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 03:51:51 -0400
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >> The key thing here is that our recent changes in
> >> how the locks are _used_ is okay -- and I think it is.
> >
> >Well. We don't know that. We just know that this report of unokayness
> >wasn't right. With Ingo's Linux-only patch we're in a
> >position to verify
> >that the locking is probably OK.
>
> If this were really recursive, my machine would have deadlocked
> instead of booting normally like it did, no?
yup. If it's SMP ;)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/