Re: [patch 2/3] rtmutex: Propagate priority settings into PI lockchains
From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Thu Jun 22 2006 - 10:20:04 EST
I've stated these comments on the -rt thread, but it's more important to
repeat them here.
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> /*
> + * Recheck the pi chain, in case we got a priority setting
> + *
> + * Called from sched_setscheduler
> + */
> +void rt_mutex_adjust_pi(struct task_struct *task)
> +{
> + struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
> +
> + waiter = task->pi_blocked_on;
Good to see you fixed the waiter race that I mentioned in the other
thread. You did it before I mentioned it, but I didn't read this yet ;)
> + if (!waiter || waiter->list_entry.prio == task->prio) {
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + /* gets dropped in rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain()! */
> + get_task_struct(task);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
> +
> + rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(task, 0, NULL, NULL, task);
The above means that you cant ever call sched_setscheduler from a
interrupt handler (or softirq). The rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain since that
grabs wait_lock which is not for interrupt use.
> +}
> +
> +/*
> * Slow path lock function:
> */
> static int __sched
> @@ -633,6 +663,7 @@
> if (unlikely(ret))
> break;
> }
> +
> spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
>
> debug_rt_mutex_print_deadlock(&waiter);
[...]
>
> extern void set_user_nice(task_t *p, long nice);
> Index: linux-2.6.17-mm/kernel/sched.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.17-mm.orig/kernel/sched.c 2006-06-22 10:26:11.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.17-mm/kernel/sched.c 2006-06-22 10:26:11.000000000 +0200
Oh and Thomas...
export QUILT_DIFF_OPTS='-p'
> @@ -4119,6 +4119,8 @@
Can sched_setscheduler be called from interrupt context?
> __task_rq_unlock(rq);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, flags);
>
> + rt_mutex_adjust_pi(p);
> +
> return 0;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sched_setscheduler);
I haven't found any place that this was called from interrupt context, but
with this added, it can not be. So it should be documented that
sched_setscheduler grabs locks that are not to be called from interrupt
context.
-- Steve
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Index: linux-2.6.17-rc4-mm1/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.17-rc4-mm1.orig/kernel/sched.c 2006-06-22 10:13:50.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.17-rc4-mm1/kernel/sched.c 2006-06-22 10:15:09.000000000 -0400
@@ -4006,6 +4006,10 @@ static void __setscheduler(struct task_s
* @p: the task in question.
* @policy: new policy.
* @param: structure containing the new RT priority.
+ *
+ * Do not call this from interrupt context. If RT_MUTEXES is configured
+ * then it can grab spin locks that are not protected with interrupts
+ * disabled.
*/
int sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p, int policy,
struct sched_param *param)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/