Re: [PATCH] stop on cpu lost

[Pavel Machek]

On Ät 22-06-06 12:52:32, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Pavel Machek wrote:
> >That's what I'd prefer... as swsusp uses cpu hotplug.
> 
> Does it have to?  I presume this has been considered before, but what if 
> the other CPUs were just idled for suspend rather than "removed"?

Basically yes, it has to. Idling cpus is easy, but bringing cpus back
up during resume is not, and we'd like to reuse cpu hotplug code.
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/