Re: [patch 21/61] lock validator: lockdep: add local_irq_enable_in_hardirq() API.

[Ingo Molnar]

* Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > > Also, trace_irqflags.h doesn't seem an appropriate place for it to 
> > > live.
> > 
> > seems like the most practical place for it. Previously we had no 
> > central include file for irq-flags APIs (they used to be included 
> > from asm/system.h and other random per-arch places) - 
> > trace_irqflags.h has become the central file now. Should i rename it 
> > to irqflags.h perhaps, to not tie it to tracing? We have some 
> > deprecated irq-flags ops in interrupt.h, maybe this all belongs 
> > there. (although i think it's cleaner to have 
> > linux/include/irqflags.h and include it from interrupt.h)
> > 
> 
> Yes, irqflags.h is nice.

ok, done.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/