Re: [patch 2/6] [Network namespace] Network device sharing by view

[Ben Greear]

Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Herbert Poetzl <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>
> > On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 05:52:52AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >
> > > Inside the containers I want all network devices named eth0!
> >
> > huh? even if there are two of them? also tun?
> >
> > I think you meant, you want to be able to have eth0 in
> > _more_ than one guest where eth0 in a guest can also
> > be/use/relate to eth1 on the host, right?
>
>
> Right I want to have an eth0 in each guest where eth0 is
> it's own network device and need have no relationship to
> eth0 on the host.

How does that help anything?  Do you envision programs
that make special decisions on whether the interface is
called eth0 v/s eth151?

Ben


--
Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/