Re: [2.6 patch] let CONFIG_SECCOMP default to n

[Lee Revell]

On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 19:35 -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 18:07:06 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> > Lee Revell <rlrevell@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 21:21 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > > This patch was already sent on:
> > > > - 26 Jun 2006
> > > > - 27 Apr 2006
> > > > - 19 Apr 2006
> > > > - 11 Apr 2006
> > > > - 10 Mar 2006
> > > > - 29 Jan 2006
> > > > - 21 Jan 2006 
> > > 
> > > 3 days ago?  That seems a bit silly.  Why didn't you just ping Andrew on
> > > it?
> > > 
> > > Andrew, what's the status of this?  Can we get an ACK or a NACK before
> > > this starts getting reposted every day? ;-)
> > > 
> > 
> > I am stolidly letting the arch maintainers and the developer of this
> > feature work out what to do.
> 
> Bah, options that are not Required should default to n.
> I support Adrian's patch.

Agreed:

- Most people don't use it
- There's a performance hit

Clearly should default to N.

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/