Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? --usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'

[Arjan van de Ven]

On Sun, 2006-07-02 at 10:37 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > 
> >> Does this mean that you don't want to see these fno-stack-protector
> >> patches go into Andrew's tree?
> > 
> > long term.. no. Because I want to enable stack-protector for the kernel
> > (I have patches for that; all it needs is a 5 line gcc patch to make it
> > work) as debug option at least (and if the perf impact isn't too bad,
> > distros and security sensitive people can enable it always). 
> > 
> 
> Obviously, but at that time we should enable -fno-stack-protector vs 

-fno-stack-protector doesn't even exist afaics; simply because gcc has
this as a positive commandline option only..

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/