Re: [PATCH] genirq: ARM dyntick cleanup

[Russell King]

On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 05:35:27PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> This is not exactly a thing of beauty either.  It's much cleaner to use
> __attribute__((weak)), but that will add an empty call-return to everyone's
> interrupts.

Let's not go overboard with the weak stuff - it does not get removed
at link time, so it remains as dead code in the kernel image.

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:  2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/