Re: [BUG] scsi/io-elevator held lock freed.

[Arjan van de Ven]

On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 07:54 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> I got this during boot. I booted the same kernel several times, and only
> saw it once. The kernel was 2.6.17-mm5 .
> 
> Daniel
> 
> 
> =========================
> [ BUG: held lock freed! ]
> -------------------------
> swapper/1 is freeing memory f73a8580-f73a867f, with a lock still held there!
> 2 locks held by swapper/1:
>  #0:  (&shost->scan_mutex){--..}, at: [<c0419098>] mutex_lock+0x8/0x10
>  #1:  (&eq->sysfs_lock){--..}, at: [<c0419098>] mutex_lock+0x8/0x10

blargh.. it'd be more useful if lockdep actually printed which lock it
is that it thinks is about to get freed.....

this patch ought to make it do that; could you at least add this to your
kernel?

Ingo, is this the right approach?

---
 kernel/lockdep.c |    5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6.17-mm6/kernel/lockdep.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.17-mm6.orig/kernel/lockdep.c
+++ linux-2.6.17-mm6/kernel/lockdep.c
@@ -2571,7 +2571,7 @@ static inline int in_range(const void *s
 
 static void
 print_freed_lock_bug(struct task_struct *curr, const void *mem_from,
-		     const void *mem_to)
+		     const void *mem_to, struct held_lock *hlock)
 {
 	if (!debug_locks_off())
 		return;
@@ -2583,6 +2583,7 @@ print_freed_lock_bug(struct task_struct 
 	printk(  "-------------------------\n");
 	printk("%s/%d is freeing memory %p-%p, with a lock still held there!\n",
 		curr->comm, curr->pid, mem_from, mem_to-1);
+	print_lock(hlock);
 	lockdep_print_held_locks(curr);
 
 	printk("\nstack backtrace:\n");
@@ -2616,7 +2617,7 @@ void debug_check_no_locks_freed(const vo
 					!in_range(mem_from, lock_to, mem_to))
 			continue;
 
-		print_freed_lock_bug(curr, mem_from, mem_to);
+		print_freed_lock_bug(curr, mem_from, mem_to, hlock);
 		break;
 	}
 	local_irq_restore(flags);


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/