RE: [RFC][PATCH 9/13] Equinox SST driver: tty interface
From: Straub, Michael
Date: Wed Jul 05 2006 - 10:35:07 EST
Thanks for the comments.
I'll apply the suggested changes, not just here but to all of the source
files.
mike
-----Original Message-----
From: Randy.Dunlap [mailto:rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 7:53 PM
To: Straub, Michael
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 9/13] Equinox SST driver: tty interface
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 09:20:28 -0400 Straub, Michael wrote:
> Adds Equinox multi-port serial (SST) driver.
>
> Part 9: new source file: drivers/char/eqnx/sst_tty.c. Provides the
> standard TTY interface routines for the SST driver.
---
sst_tty.c | 1961
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 1961 insertions(+)
Use "diffstat -p1 -w70" please.
diff -Naurp -X dontdiff linux-2.6.17/drivers/char/eqnx/sst_tty.c
linux-2.6.17.eqnx/drivers/char/eqnx/sst_tty.c
--- linux-2.6.17/drivers/char/eqnx/sst_tty.c 1969-12-31
19:00:00.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.17.eqnx/drivers/char/eqnx/sst_tty.c 2006-06-20
09:50:09.000000000 -0400
@@ -0,0 +1,1961 @@
+/*
+
+#include <linux/config.h>
don't need config.h (autoconf.h is automatically #included)
+#include <linux/version.h>
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_MODVERSIONS
+#define MODVERSIONS 1
+#endif
not used
+/* defer call to write_wakeup */
+int eqnx_write_wakeup_deferred = 0;
static?
+/* external variable and routines */
+/**********************************************************************
*****/
These should be in a header file:
+extern int eqnx_nssps;
+extern struct mpdev eqnx_dev[MAXSSP];
+extern struct mpchan *eqnx_chan;
+extern struct datascope eqnx_dscope[2];
+extern char *eqnx_tmpwritebuf;
+extern struct semaphore eqnx_tmpwritesem;
+
+extern void eqnx_megaparam(int);
+extern int eqnx_modem(int, int);
+extern void eqnx_frame_wait(struct mpchan *, int);
+extern void eqnx_chnl_sync(struct mpchan *);
+extern int SSTMINOR(unsigned int, unsigned int);
+extern u32 eqnx_get_modem_info(struct mpchan *);
+extern void eqnx_set_modem_info(struct mpchan *, unsigned int, unsigned
int,
+ struct tty_struct *);
+
+/*
+ * eqnx_open(tty, filp)
+ *
+ * Open of tty device associated with SST channel.
+ *
+ * tty = pointer to tty structure being opened.
+ * filp = file structure.
+ */
Might as well use kernel-doc format since it is almost there.
See Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt.
(multiple places)
+int eqnx_open(struct tty_struct *tty, struct file *filp)
+{
static?
+ /* validate channel number */
+ if ((d > (eqnx_nssps * MAXCHNL_BRD)) || (eqnx_nssps == 0) || (d
< 0))
+ return (-ENODEV);
no parens (multiple places)
+ if (tty->termios == NULL) {
+ *tty->termios = *mpc->normaltermios;
+ }
Don't use braces for 1-statement blocks. (multiple places)
+void eqnx_close(struct tty_struct *tty, struct file *filp)
static?
+{
+
+ /* channel validity checks */
+ if (tty == (struct tty_struct *)NULL)
Cast not needed, please drop it.
+ return;
+ mpc = (struct mpchan *)tty->driver_data;
+ if (mpc == (struct mpchan *)NULL)
+ return;
ditto (+ multiple other places)
+ d = SSTMINOR(mpc->mpc_major, mpc->mpc_minor);
+ if (d > (eqnx_nssps * MAXCHNL_BRD))
+ return;
+
+ if ((mpd = mpc->mpc_mpd) == (struct mpdev *)NULL)
+ return;
Drop the cast. And preferably split the if-test into 2 lines of
assignment + if-test.
+ nchan = MPCHAN(d);
+ if ((mpd >= &eqnx_dev[eqnx_nssps]) || (!(mpd->mpd_alive)) ||
+ (nchan >= (int)mpd->mpd_nchan))
+ return;
+}
+
+static void eqnx_flush_chars_locked(struct tty_struct *tty)
+{
+ struct mpchan *mpc;
+ struct mpdev *mpd;
+ unsigned int d;
+
...
+ if (eqnx_txcooktty == NULL)
+ return;
Don't need this else + braces:
+ else {
+
+#ifdef DEBUG_LOCKS
+ if (!(spin_is_locked(&mpd->mpd_lock)))
+ dev_dbg(mpd->dev, "eqnx_flush_chars_locked: mpd
"
+ "lock !locked\n");
+#endif
+
+ if (mpd->mpd_board_def->asic == SSP64) {
+ /* SSP64 */
+ unsigned int cooksize = eqnx_txcooksize;
+ eqnx_txcooksize = 0;
+ eqnx_txcookrealsize = 0;
+ eqnx_txcooktty = (struct tty_struct *)NULL;
+ if (cooksize == 0)
+ return;
+ dev_dbg(mpd->dev, "eqnx_flush_chars_locked: "
+ "calling eqnx_write_SSP64\n");
+ eqnx_write_SSP64(mpc, eqnx_txcookbuf, cooksize);
+ } else {
+ /* SSP4 */
+ if (mpc->xmit_cnt == 0)
+ return;
+ dev_dbg(mpd->dev, "eqnx_flush_chars_locked: "
+ "calling eqnx_write_SSP4\n");
+ eqnx_write_SSP4(mpc, EQNX_COOKED);
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+void eqnx_flush_chars(struct tty_struct *tty)
+{
+ struct mpchan *mpc;
+ struct mpdev *mpd;
+ unsigned int d;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
...
+ if (eqnx_txcooktty == NULL)
+ return;
Drop the else + braces?
+ else {
+
+#ifdef DEBUG_LOCKS
+ if (spin_is_locked(&mpd->mpd_lock))
+ dev_dbg(mpd->dev, "eqnx_flush_chars: mpd lock "
+ "already held\n");
+#endif
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&mpd->mpd_lock, flags);
+ eqnx_flush_chars_locked(tty);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mpd->mpd_lock, flags);
+
+ if (eqnx_write_wakeup_deferred) {
+ eqnx_write_wakeup_deferred = 0;
+ tty->ldisc.write_wakeup(tty);
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+void eqnx_throttle(struct tty_struct *tty)
static?
+{
+ struct mpchan *mpc;
+ struct mpdev *mpd;
+ int d;
+
+ /* channel validity checks */
+ if (tty == (struct tty_struct *)NULL)
+ return;
+ mpc = (struct mpchan *)tty->driver_data;
+ if (mpc == (struct mpchan *)NULL)
+ return;
+
+ d = SSTMINOR(mpc->mpc_major, mpc->mpc_minor);
+ if (d > (eqnx_nssps * MAXCHNL_BRD))
+ return;
About all of these validity checks: is it actually possible
for all of these functions to be called when they shouldn't be?
There seems to be an over-abundance of these checks.
+ mpd = mpc->mpc_mpd;
+ dev_dbg(mpd->dev, "eqnx_throttle: device %d\n",
+ SSTMINOR(mpc->mpc_major, mpc->mpc_minor));
+ mpc->mpc_block = true;
+}
+
+void eqnx_flush_buffer_locked(struct tty_struct *tty)
static?
+{
+ struct mpchan *mpc;
+ struct mpdev *mpd;
+ volatile struct icp_in_struct *icpi;
+ volatile struct icp_out_struct *icpo;
+ volatile struct cout_que_struct *icpq;
+ volatile struct cin_bnk_struct *icpb;
Use of volatile is highly frowned on.
Please read these volatile emails from Linus:
http://www.x86-64.org/lists/discuss/msg07347.html
http://www.x86-64.org/lists/discuss/msg07358.html
+ u8 cin;
+ u16 nxt_dma;
+ int d;
+
...
+#ifdef DEBUG_LOCKS
+ if (!(spin_is_locked(&mpd->mpd_lock)))
+ dev_dbg(mpd->dev, "eqnx_flush_buffer_locked: mpd lock
not "
+ "locked\n");
+#endif
+
+ icpi = mpc->mpc_icpi;
+ icpo = mpc->mpc_icpo;
+ icpq = &icpo->cout_q0;
+
+ dev_dbg(mpd->dev, "eqnx_flush_buffer_locked: device = %d\n", d);
+ if (tty == eqnx_txcooktty) {
+ eqnx_txcooktty = (struct tty_struct *)NULL;
+ eqnx_txcooksize = 0;
+ eqnx_txcookrealsize = 0;
+ }
+
+ /* flush transmit buffers */
+ icpo->cout_lck_cntrl |= LCK_Q_ACT;
+ eqnx_chnl_sync(mpc);
+ icpo->cout_dma_stat_save = 0;
+ icpo->cout_intnl_fifo_ptrs = 0;
+ SSTWR16(icpq->q_data_count, 0);
+ mpc->mpc_count = 0;
+ SSTWR16(icpq->q_data_ptr_l, (mpc->mpc_txq.q_begin +
mpc->mpc_txbase));
+ mpc->mpc_txq.q_ptr = mpc->mpc_txq.q_begin;
+ mpc->xmit_cnt = mpc->xmit_head = mpc->xmit_tail = 0;
+ SSTWR16(icpo->cout_attn_enbl, EN_REG_UPDT_EV);
+ icpo->cout_lck_cntrl &= ~LCK_Q_ACT;
+ mpc->mpc_flags &= ~MPC_BUSY;
+
+ /* flush receiver queue */
+ /* set rx ptr = tail */
+ icpb = (icpi->cin_locks & LOCK_A) ? &icpi->cin_bank_b :
+ &icpi->cin_bank_a;
+ /* wait for valid registers */
+ if (!(SSTRD16(icpb->bank_events) & EV_REG_UPDT))
+ eqnx_frame_wait(mpc, 2);
+ cin = icpi->cin_locks;
+ icpi->cin_locks = cin | (DIS_BANK_A | DIS_BANK_B);
+ eqnx_chnl_sync(mpc);
+ icpi->cin_bank_a.bank_fifo_lvl &= ~0x8f;
+ icpi->cin_bank_b.bank_fifo_lvl &= ~0x8f;
+ nxt_dma = SSTRD16(icpb->bank_nxt_dma);
+ SSTWR16(icpi->cin_tail_ptr_a, nxt_dma);
+ SSTWR16(icpi->cin_tail_ptr_b, nxt_dma);
+ mpc->mpc_rxq.q_ptr = nxt_dma;
+ icpi->cin_locks = cin;
+ mpc->mpc_flags |= MPC_RXFLUSH;
+ mpc->mpc_block = false;
+ wake_up_interruptible(&tty->write_wait);
+
+ /* signal write wakeup when safe to call ldisc */
+ if ((tty->flags & (1 << TTY_DO_WRITE_WAKEUP)) &&
+ tty->ldisc.write_wakeup)
+ eqnx_write_wakeup_deferred++;
+}
+
+void eqnx_set_termios(struct tty_struct *tty, struct termios *old)
+{
static? or is it called from other modules?
...
+}
+
+static void chanoff(struct mpchan *mpc)
+{
+ volatile struct icp_in_struct *icpi;
+ volatile struct icp_out_struct *icpo;
+ volatile struct cout_que_struct *icpq;
+ volatile struct cin_bnk_struct *icpb;
+ int loop, ok;
+ u8 cin;
+ u16 events, nxt_dma, attn_ena;
+
+ icpi = mpc->mpc_icpi;
+ icpo = mpc->mpc_icpo;
+ icpq = &icpo->cout_q0;
+ icpb = (icpi->cin_locks & LOCK_A) ? &icpi->cin_bank_b :
+ &icpi->cin_bank_a;
+ /* make sure registers are valid */
+ if (!(SSTRD16(icpb->bank_events) & EV_REG_UPDT))
+ eqnx_frame_wait(mpc, 2);
+
+ mpc->mpc_param &= (IOCTLLB | IOCTCTS | IOCTLCK | IOCTRTS);
+
+ /* disable events */
+ attn_ena = SSTRD16(icpi->cin_attn_ena);
+ attn_ena &= (ENA_DCD_CNG | ENA_CTS_CNG | ENA_DSR_CNG |
ENA_RI_CNG);
+ if (!(mpc->mpc_chan % 16))
+ attn_ena |= ENA_LMX_CNG;
+ SSTWR16(icpi->cin_attn_ena, attn_ena);
+
+ /* lock output */
+ icpo->cout_lck_cntrl |= LCK_Q_ACT;
+ eqnx_chnl_sync(mpc);
+ icpo->cout_intnl_fifo_ptrs = 0;
+ icpo->cout_dma_stat_save = 0;
+ SSTWR16(icpq->q_data_count, 0);
+ SSTWR16(icpq->q_data_ptr_l, (mpc->mpc_txbase +
mpc->mpc_txq.q_begin));
+ mpc->mpc_txq.q_ptr = mpc->mpc_txq.q_begin;
+ mpc->mpc_count = 0;
+ mpc->carr_state = false;
+
+ /* unlock output and update */
+ icpo->cout_lck_cntrl &= ~LCK_Q_ACT;
+ eqnx_chnl_sync(mpc);
+ if ((icpo->cout_intnl_svd_toggls & TOGGLS_LSEND) ==
+ (icpo->cout_cpu_req & CPU_SND_REQ))
+ icpo->cout_cpu_req ^= CPU_SND_REQ;
+
+ /* wait for ack */
+ loop = 0;
+ ok = false;
+ while (++loop < 100000) {
This should use some kind of timing/timer, not just a counter.
+ if (SSTRD16(icpo->cout_status) & TXSR_EV_B_ACT)
+ events = SSTRD16(icpo->cout_events_b);
+ else
+ events = SSTRD16(icpo->cout_events_a);
+ if (events & EV_CPU_REQ_DN) {
+ ok = true;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (!ok)
+ dev_warn(mpc->mpc_mpd->dev, "chanoff: cpu_req ack
failed.\n");
...
+}
+
+/*
+ * delay_jiffies(len)
+ *
+ * Delay by the specified number of jiffies.
+ *
+ * len = jiffies to delay.
+ */
+static void delay_jiffies(int len)
+{
+ if (len > 0) {
+ msleep(jiffies_to_msecs(len));
+ }
No braces on 1-statement blocks.
+}
---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/